This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
Skip to main content
Green Party of Canada WeDecide / Parti Vert du Canada Decidons's official logo
  • English Choose language Choisir la langue
    • Français
Sign Up Sign In
  • Watch Race!
  • Leadership Race
  • Leadership Events
  • Leadership Campaigns
  • Calendar
  • Policy Process
  • Help

2020- 2022 Policy Process | Green Party of Canada

Where GPC membership collaborates to develop our policies

Phase 1 of 1
Review and Comment 2020-03-26 - 2022-03-27
Process phases
  • The process
  • VGM Results
  • All Proposals
  • VGM Proposals
chevron-left Back to list

G21-P050 Give NGOs Equal Access to Policymakers

Avatar: Official proposal Official proposal
05/06/2021 13:00  

Submitter Name

Peter Royle

Ratification Vote Results: Adopted


Proposal

The GPC advocates ensuring equitable access to public servants by:


  • Requiring officials who recommend policy to maintain a 1:1 ratio of contacts with NGOs (live, virtual or phone) and representatives of the for-profit sector,

  • Ensuring presentations and briefing notes are submitted and publicly available, and

  • Prohibiting closed-door meetings where a significant conflict of interest exists.

Objective

To ensure that non-profit organizations’ opportunities to present evidence in the public interest to government officials equal similar opportunities available to industry representatives and lobbyists.

Benefit

Evidence-based policymaking directs the nation’s resources responsibly by avoiding harm and maximizing public benefit rather than favouring vested interests. A study covering the period 2011-2018 showed fossil fuel industry lobbyists met with policy-makers 5 times as often as NGOs over a 7 year period. This imbalance must be redressed.

Supporting Comments from Submitter

Previous Canada Food Guides were developed with extensive lobbying from industry groups. The current Canada Food Guide was developed without participation of the food and beverage industry representatives in order to ensure that the development of dietary guidance took place free from conflict of interest. The result is that the new Guide is in line with international best evidence and has been widely praised by health groups.

“Health experts applaud Canada’s new food guide, though some question lack of portion sizes” 22 Jan. 2019.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4875553/canada-new-food-guide-health/

Revision process for Canada's food guide.

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/about/revision-process.html

Strategies used by the Canadian food and beverage Industry to influence food and nutrition policies.

https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0900-8

A study examining federal lobbying by oil, gas and coal companies and their industry associations across a seven-year period from 2011 to 2018 found that the fossil fuel industry recorded 11,452 lobbying contacts with government officials. The sector lobbied the federal government at rates five times higher than environmental non-governmental organizations.

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/canada%E2%80%99s-fossil-fuel-lobby-influences-policy-and-decisions-major-federal

Canada has invested billions of dollars of COVID-19 stimulus money into the fossil fuel industry and very little into renewable energy.

https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/aid-for-energy-heavily-weighted-towards-fossil-fuels-in-covid-19-response

Green Value(s)

Ecological Wisdom, Sustainability, Participatory Democracy, Social Justice, Respect for Diversity, Non-Violence.

Relation to Existing Policy

Add to current GPC policy.

  • Filter results for category: Policy Proposal Policy Proposal

List of Endorsements

Avatar: Blocked user Blocked user
Avatar: Peter Royle Peter Royle
Avatar: Jamie Ker Jamie Ker
Amend Proposal Improve this proposal by modifying its title and body
Endorsements count3
G21-P050 Give NGOs Equal Access to Policymakers Comments 10

Reference: PVC-PROP-2021-06-2400
Version number 4 (of 4) see other versions
Check fingerprint

Fingerprint

The piece of text below is a shortened, hashed representation of this content. It's useful to ensure the content hasn't been tampered with, as a single modification would result in a totally different value.

Value: ac65493cfb8874988de9b499b964ac0803113cc9c2e6cf20a0225a296e4d5776

Source: {"body":{"en":"<h4>Submitter Name</h4><p>Peter Royle</p><h4>Ratification Vote Results: Adopted</h4><p><br></p><h4>Proposal</h4><p>The GPC advocates ensuring equitable access to public servants by:</p><ul><li>Requiring officials who recommend policy to maintain a 1:1 ratio of contacts with NGOs (live, virtual or phone) and representatives of the for-profit sector,</li><li>Ensuring presentations and briefing notes are submitted and publicly available, and</li><li>Prohibiting closed-door meetings where a significant conflict of interest exists.</li></ul><h4>Objective</h4><p>To ensure that non-profit organizations’ opportunities to present evidence in the public interest to government officials equal similar opportunities available to industry representatives and lobbyists.</p><h4>Benefit</h4><p>Evidence-based policymaking directs the nation’s resources responsibly by avoiding harm and maximizing public benefit rather than favouring vested interests. A study covering the period 2011-2018 showed fossil fuel industry lobbyists met with policy-makers 5 times as often as NGOs over a 7 year period. This imbalance must be redressed.</p><h4>Supporting Comments from Submitter</h4><p>Previous Canada Food Guides were developed with extensive lobbying from industry groups. The current Canada Food Guide was developed without participation of the food and beverage industry representatives in order to ensure that the development of dietary guidance took place free from conflict of interest. The result is that the new Guide is in line with international best evidence and has been widely praised by health groups.</p><p>“Health experts applaud Canada’s new food guide, though some question lack of portion sizes” 22 Jan. 2019.</p><p><a href=\"https://globalnews.ca/news/4875553/canada-new-food-guide-health/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://globalnews.ca/news/4875553/canada-new-food-guide-health/</a></p><p>Revision process for Canada's food guide.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/about/revision-process.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/about/revision-process.html</a></p><p>Strategies used by the Canadian food and beverage Industry to influence food and nutrition policies.</p><p><a href=\"https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0900-8\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0900-8</a></p><p>A study examining federal lobbying by oil, gas and coal companies and their industry associations across a seven-year period from 2011 to 2018 found that the fossil fuel industry recorded 11,452 lobbying contacts with government officials. The sector lobbied the federal government at rates five times higher than environmental non-governmental organizations.</p><p><a href=\"https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/canada%E2%80%99s-fossil-fuel-lobby-influences-policy-and-decisions-major-federal\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/canada%E2%80%99s-fossil-fuel-lobby-influences-policy-and-decisions-major-federal</a></p><p>Canada has invested billions of dollars of COVID-19 stimulus money into the fossil fuel industry and very little into renewable energy.</p><p><a href=\"https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/aid-for-energy-heavily-weighted-towards-fossil-fuels-in-covid-19-response\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/aid-for-energy-heavily-weighted-towards-fossil-fuels-in-covid-19-response</a></p><h4>Green Value(s)</h4><p>Ecological Wisdom, Sustainability, Participatory Democracy, Social Justice, Respect for Diversity, Non-Violence.</p><h4>Relation to Existing Policy</h4><p>Add to current GPC policy.</p>","fr":"<h4>Auteur</h4><p>Peter Royle</p><h4>Proposition</h4><p>Le PVC préconise d'assurer un accès équitable aux fonctionnaires :</p><ul><li><strong>E</strong>n exigeant que les fonctionnaires qui recommandent des politiques maintiennent un rapport de 1:1 entre les contacts avec les ONG (en direct, virtuellement ou par téléphone) et les représentants du secteur à but lucratif,</li><li>en s'assurant que les présentations et les notes d'information sont soumises et accessibles à la population, et</li><li>en interdisant les réunions à huis clos lorsqu'il existe un conflit d'intérêts important.</li></ul><h4>Objectif</h4><p>Veiller à ce que les possibilités offertes aux organisations à but non lucratif de présenter des preuves dans l'intérêt public aux responsables gouvernementaux soient égales aux possibilités similaires offertes aux représentants de l'industrie et aux lobbyistes.</p><h4>Avantage</h4><p>L'élaboration de politiques fondées sur des données probantes oriente les ressources de la nation de manière responsable en évitant les dommages et en maximisant les avantages publics plutôt qu'en favorisant les intérêts particuliers. Une étude couvrant la période 2011-2018 a montré que les lobbyistes de l'industrie des combustibles fossiles ont rencontré les décideurs politiques 5 fois plus souvent que les ONG sur une période de 7 ans. Ce déséquilibre doit être corrigé.</p><h4>Commentaires d’appui de l’auteur.e</h4><p>Les guides alimentaires canadiens précédents ont été élaborés grâce à un lobbying intensif de la part des groupes industriels. Le Guide alimentaire canadien actuel a été élaboré sans la participation de représentants de l'industrie des aliments et des boissons afin de garantir que l'élaboration de conseils diététiques se déroule sans conflit d'intérêt. Le résultat est que le nouveau guide est conforme aux meilleures preuves internationales et a été largement salué par les groupes de santé.</p><p>« Les experts de la santé applaudissent le nouveau guide alimentaire canadien, bien que certains remettent en question l'absence de taille des portions » 22 janv. 2019. https://globalnews.ca/news/4875553/canada-new-food-guide-health/.</p><p>Processus de révision du guide alimentaire canadien. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canada-food-guide/about/revision-process.html</p><p>Stratégies utilisées par l'industrie canadienne des aliments et des boissons pour influencer les politiques alimentaires et nutritionnelles. https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-019-0900-8</p><p>Une étude examinant le lobbying fédéral des entreprises pétrolières, gazières et charbonnières et de leurs associations industrielles sur une période de sept ans, de 2011 à 2018, a révélé que l'industrie des combustibles fossiles a enregistré 11 452 contacts de lobbying avec des représentants du gouvernement. Le secteur a fait du lobbying auprès du gouvernement fédéral à des taux cinq fois plus élevés que les organisations non gouvernementales environnementales.</p><p>https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/commentary/canada%E2%80%99s-fossil-fuel-lobby-influences-policy-and-decisions-major-federal</p><p>Le Canada a investi des milliards de dollars de l'argent de la relance post-pandémie dans l'industrie des combustibles fossiles et très peu dans les énergies renouvelables. https://nationalpost.com/pmn/news-pmn/canada-news-pmn/aid-for-energy-heavily-weighted-towards-fossil-fuels-in-covid-19-response</p><h4>Valeur(s) Vertes</h4><p>Sagesse écologique, Justice sociale, Démocratie participative,&nbsp;Non-violence, Développement durable, Respect de la diversité</p><h4>Lien avec la politique actuelle</h4><p><strong></strong>Ajouter à la politique actuelle du PVC.</p>"},"title":{"en":"G21-P050 Give NGOs Equal Access to Policymakers","fr":"G21-P050 Donner aux ONG un accès égal aux décideurs politiques"}}

This fingerprint is calculated using a SHA256 hashing algorithm. In order to replicate it yourself, you can use an MD5 calculator online and copy-paste the source data.

Share:

link-intact Share link

Share link:

Please paste this code in your page:

<script src="https://leadership.green.ca/processes/Policy2021/f/275/proposals/2400/embed.js"></script>
<noscript><iframe src="https://leadership.green.ca/processes/Policy2021/f/275/proposals/2400/embed.html" frameborder="0" scrolling="vertical"></iframe></noscript>

Report inappropriate content

Is this content inappropriate?

Reason

10 comments

Order by:
  • Older
    • Best rated
    • Recent
    • Older
    • Most discussed
Avatar: Andrew Jehan Andrew Jehan
13/07/2021 09:13
  • Get link Get link

Many non-profit organizations are astroturfing - groups funded by large private industries in order to promote their interests, while falsely purporting to represent community interests. How can this policy be revised to ensure that it benefits authentic community organizations rather than disguised corporate lobbyists?

Avatar: Sarah Gabrielle Baron Sarah Gabrielle Baron verified-badge
10/08/2021 21:21
  • Get link Get link
In favor  

Great point, @Andrew Jehan! I had already voted Green before I read your comment. If this gets yellow-lit, I hope you're able to suggest that friendly amendment. In the end, what the entire lobbyist environment needs is transparency and reporting. Really, we just need to remember and bring forward G06-P69 Lobbyists. It's very detailed and robust. Then, if this information was public, who is lobbying whom, we'd be able as citizen groups to hold them accountable. I like this motion, it's just a bit of an unecessary overlap with a previously existing policy. That said, I still like it!

Avatar: Peter Royle Peter Royle
25/03/2022 02:33
  • Get link Get link

Here is G-06-P69 referred to by @Sarah Gabrielle Baron in her comment above:

G06-p69: Lobbyists
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Green Party of Canada will advocate:
a) the requirement for all people covered by ethics rules to report any violations of the rules, and require the ethics watchdog to protect anyone who reports a violation of ethics rules from retaliation.
b) the amendment of the Access to Information legislation to strengthen the right to disclosure of information and to strengthen enforcement of the law.
c) the requirement of Ministers and senior public officials to disclose their contacts with all paid lobbyists.
d) the inclusion of measures and provisions to prevent people from exploiting any loopholes as part of lobbying and ethics rules.
e) that the Registrar for Lobbyists be appointed at arms length from government, based on merit, and that s/he, as enforcer of the Lobbyists Code of Conduct, report directly to Parliament.

Conversation with Jamie Ker
Avatar: Jamie Ker Jamie Ker
26/03/2022 11:45
  • Get link Get link
Against  

Disagree with the proposal on the same grounds as Sarah

Avatar: Jamie Ker Jamie Ker
01/06/2022 16:07
  • Get link Get link

changed my mind: it's a good proposal

Conversation with Shel Goldstein
Avatar: Shel Goldstein Shel Goldstein
12/06/2022 20:36
  • Get link Get link

While very in favour of the objectives of this proposal, I do wish that it had been amended to repair "to maintain a 1:1 ratio of contacts with NGOs (live, virtual or phone) and representatives of the for-profit sector", which would force a policy maker to seek out industry lobbyists IF citizens' groups and NGOs advocated so effectively as to outnumber industry inputs. I don't think a strict 1:1 ratio is necessary.

Avatar: Peter Royle Peter Royle
20/06/2022 00:24
  • Get link Get link

Interesting observation @Shel Goldstein. It would be fun if it ever reached the point that ENGO contacts outnumbered the well-funded commercial and self-interested lobbyists. By that time we would certainly want to reconsider that 1:1 ratio objective.

There have been some helpful comments here. The observation about astro-turfing; the existence of a similar policy already, and perhaps some other way of expressing the need for transparency in the lobbying industry overall should be considered. If there were interest in doing some work-shopping of this policy so that it can be improved, we certainly can get together before the next General Meeting, and prepare an amended policy proposal to present at that meeting.

This would be a good place to start that conversation. The Rocket Chat is also available, and we can certainly work out ways to work together on it.

Conversation with Peter Royle
Avatar: Peter Royle Peter Royle
17/10/2022 20:20
  • Get link Get link

How a controversy over GMOs exposed holes in Canada’s lobbying laws
By Marc Fawcett-Atkinson | News | October 17th 2022 National Obserber

A controversy over an industry lobbyist's input into draft guidelines for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has exposed gaping loopholes in Canada's lobbying laws, experts say.

Jennifer Hubert, the executive director of plant bioengineering at CropLife Canada — one of Canada's largest agrochemical lobbies — appears to have written an early draft of proposed guidelines for the Canada Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) that would exempt seed companies from disclosing genetically modified products to consumers.

Metadata shows her as the creator of the Microsoft Word document leaked to Radio-Canada last month and indicates it was later modified by CFIA. Neither group denies CropLife Canada had input in the drafting process, but both maintain CFIA will have full control over the final product.

The document outlines CFIA proposals for how the government should interpret regulations for GMO seeds and supports an approach that would allow major seed companies to put some genetically engineered seeds on the market without publicly disclosing their products are GMOs.

The approach would hit Canada's organic farmers especially hard because they are prohibited from using genetically engineered seeds and other GMOs. Without this disclosure, organic farmers will struggle to know if their seeds are genetically engineered or not.

A day after the story broke, on Sept. 20, federal Agriculture Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau assured farmers she has directed CFIA to ensure the pending regulations will not impact organic certifications. She gave no details about how the agency would protect the organic industry.

You can follow this link to read the complete article, which will also allow you to connect to related articles.

Avatar: Peter Royle Peter Royle
17/10/2022 20:22
  • Get link Get link

Sorry! Here is the link to the article: http://bitly.ws/vx7j

Avatar: Shel Goldstein Shel Goldstein
17/10/2022 21:24
  • Get link Get link

nasty

Add your comment

Sign in with your account or sign up to add your comment.

Loading comments ...

  • Thank you
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Safe Spaces Content Guidelines
  • Download Open Data files
  • Green Party of Canada WeDecide / Parti Vert du Canada Decidons at Twitter Twitter
  • Green Party of Canada WeDecide / Parti Vert du Canada Decidons at Facebook Facebook
  • Green Party of Canada WeDecide / Parti Vert du Canada Decidons at Instagram Instagram
  • Green Party of Canada WeDecide / Parti Vert du Canada Decidons at YouTube YouTube
Creative Commons License Website made with free software.
Decidim Logo

Confirm

OK Cancel

Please sign in

Sign in with GPC account
Or

Sign up

Forgot your password?